Agno vs crewAI

Comprehensive side-by-side comparison — features, pricing, performance, and more.

Data last refreshed August 2026

Agno

Agno Inc.

Agent framework & high-performance runtime for multi-agent systems

Open Source

86% verification coverage

crewAI

CrewAI

The Enterprise Agent Build & Runtime for the work your business runs on

Freemium

84% verification coverage

Trust & Reliability

Agno

Uptime:100%Status page

Users:10K-100K

Customers (per vendor):Key Data, The Kiln, Thinqpoint +2

crewAI

Uptime:99.60%Status page

Users:100K-1M

Customers (per vendor):DocuSign, Experian, PepsiCo +7

SOC 2

Too Close to Call

crewAI (6.7) vs Agno (6.3) — difference of 0.3 points

Scores are AI-estimated from publicly available data — not an independent test or a verified user rating. How we rank →

AI Comparison Summary

Agno

6.3

avg score

crewAI

6.7

avg score

Both tools score very similarly overall — the best choice depends on your specific priorities.

Based on 6 dimensions

Scores are AI-estimated from publicly available data — not an independent test or a verified user rating. How we rank →

Too close to call — it's a tie

Agno

Best For

Engineering teams building custom AI agent platforms for internal use

Developers needing a flexible, high-performance runtime for multi-agent systems

Companies requiring full data privacy and control over their AI infrastructure

Companies running their agent platform in their own cloud

crewAI

Best For

Enterprise platform teams needing central governance for AI agents

Business teams automating long-horizon work with collaborative AI

Engineers building complex operational agents with robust control

Organizations scaling agentic AI across the organization

* Verdict is based on our algorithmic scoring of publicly available data. Learn about our methodology

Agno is best for

🤖Automation & Agents8.2💻Coding & Dev8.0📊Data & Analytics8.0

crewAI is best for

💻Coding & Dev8.0🤖Automation & Agents6.0🎧Customer Support5.0

Filter by your use case:

Limitations

Agno

Cons

Agents, teams and workflows are written in Python
SAML SSO is a paid add-on ($300/mo) rather than an included feature

crewAI

Cons

Free plan limited to 50 workflow executions per month
Enterprise features like SSO and dedicated support are only available on custom plans
Onboarding and advanced training are available à la carte for enterprise clients

Weighted Score — Adjust What Matters to You

Pick a profile or drag sliders — scores and radar update instantly on the right.

Quick profiles:

Ease of Use5

Customization5

Support5

Integration5

Compliance & Data Protection5

Performance5

Planning Quality5

Dimension Comparison

Agno

6.3

/ 10

crewAI

6.7

/ 10

Your pick

Dimension Breakdown

Ease of Use

How intuitive is onboarding, UI navigation, and day-to-day usage for the target audience?

Agno

1.0

crewAI

4.0▲ +3.0

Customization

Calculated

How much can users tailor workflows, settings, prompts, or outputs to their needs?

Agno

9.0

crewAI

9.0

Support

How strong is the documentation, customer support, community, and learning resources?

Agno

10.0▲ +1.0

crewAI

9.0

Integration

Calculated

How well does it connect with other tools, APIs, and workflows?

Agno

8.0▲ +3.0

crewAI

5.0

Compliance & Data Protection

Calculated

Compliance certifications and data-protection posture, counted from ten verified signals: SOC 2 Type II, GDPR compliance, HIPAA, WCAG AA/AAA, PII redaction, licensed-only training, a published sub-processor list, a downloadable DPA, not training on user data, and a documented deletion path

Agno

2.0

crewAI

5.0▲ +3.0

Performance

Calculated

Latency + throughput speed

Agno

8.0

crewAI

8.0

Planning Quality

Calculated

Multi-step planning depth + replanning capability

Agno

—

crewAI

—

Calculated = derived from structured signals (integration count, API/open-source config, compliance certs, response-time). AI = LLM-assessed from public website content. Methodology

Task Performance

Agno

Task

crewAI

8.0

Role Definition

9.0

8.0

Task Decomposition

3.0

9.0

Agent Coordination

9.0

8.0

Inter Agent Communication

3.0

9.0

Workflow Orchestration

8.0

Tool Use Delegation

3.0

9.0

State Management

3.0

9.0

Error Recovery

3.0

9.0

Observability

9.0

Scalability Throughput

8.0

Task Delegation

8.0

Parallel Execution

3.0

* Task scores (1–10) are algorithmically generated from publicly available data.

Data is sourced from public information and vendor websites. It may not always be up-to-date — verify pricing and features directly with the vendor before purchasing.Report inaccuracy

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the main differences between Agno and crewAI?

Agno — "Agent framework & high-performance runtime for multi-agent systems". crewAI — "The Enterprise Agent Build & Runtime for the work your business runs on". The Features section on this page compares them side by side.

Who is Agno best for compared with crewAI?

Agno is best for Engineering teams building custom AI agent platforms for internal use; and for Developers needing a flexible, high-performance runtime for multi-agent systems. crewAI is best for Enterprise platform teams needing central governance for AI agents; and for Business teams automating long-horizon work with collaborative AI.

How does the pricing of Agno compare with crewAI?

Agno is open source, includes a free plan, paid plans start at $150/month. crewAI is freemium, includes a free plan. Always verify current pricing with the vendor.

Does Agno or crewAI have a free plan?

Agno is open source. crewAI has a free plan. Always verify current pricing with the vendor.

Do Agno and crewAI offer an API?

Agno offers a public API. crewAI offers a public API.

Explore Alternatives

Agno Alternatives

Tools similar to Agno

crewAI Alternatives

Tools similar to crewAI

Compare More AI Tools

Use our comparison tool to compare up to 5 AI tools side-by-side with AI-powered recommendations.