Augment Code vs Cline

Comprehensive side-by-side comparison — features, pricing, performance, and more.

Data last refreshed August 2026
Augment Code logo

Augment Code

Augment Computing

The agentic SDLC platform for loops

Paid
83% verification coverage
VS
Cline logo

Cline

Cline Bot Inc.

AI coding, open source and uncompromised

Open Source
80% verification coverage

Trust & Reliability

Augment Code

Uptime:99.93%Status page
Users:100K-1M
Customers (per vendor):Adobe, MongoDB, Pure Storage +7
GDPR
SOC 2
HIPAA

Cline

Uptime:99.9% (30-day)Status page
Users:10M-50M
Customers (per vendor):Samsung, Salesforce, Oracle +7

Overall Winner: Cline

6.6/10 vs Augment Code at 5.6/10

Leads in:
Support
Integration
Customization

Scores are AI-estimated from publicly available data — not an independent test or a verified user rating. How we rank →

AI Comparison Summary

Augment Code

5.6

avg score

Cline

6.6

avg score

Cline leads overall — particularly in Support and Integration.

Augment Code has an edge in Compliance & Data Protection.

Based on 7 dimensions

Scores are AI-estimated from publicly available data — not an independent test or a verified user rating. How we rank →

Overall Winner

Cline

6.6 / 10

Augment Code

Best For
Enterprise engineering teams automating repetitive SDLC tasks at scale
Development teams seeking to accelerate code review and merge times
Security teams automating vulnerability remediation and incident response
Organizations modernizing large, complex codebases with AI-driven migrations

Cline

Best For
Individual developers seeking an open-source, flexible AI coding assistant
Engineering teams refactoring large codebases while maintaining consistency
Organizations automating CI/CD workflows and code reviews with AI
Developers building custom AI agent applications and integrations with an SDK

* Verdict is based on our algorithmic scoring of publicly available data. Learn about our methodology

Augment Code is best for

✍️Writing & Content9.0💬Chat & Conversation9.0🔍Research7.0

Cline is best for

✍️Writing & Content9.0💬Chat & Conversation9.0🔍Research9.0

Filter by your use case:

Limitations

Augment CodeAugment Code

Cons

  • Standard and Business plans each cover up to 50 seats
ClineCline

Cons

  • You approve every step by default, unless you turn on auto-approve
Weighted Score — Adjust What Matters to You

Pick a profile or drag sliders — scores and radar update instantly on the right.

Quick profiles:

Ease of Use5
Customization5
Support5
Integration5
Compliance & Data Protection5
Performance5
Planning Quality5

Dimension Comparison

Ease of UseCustomizationSupportIntegrationCompliancePerformancePlanning

Augment Code

5.6

/ 10

Cline

6.6

/ 10

Clear winner

Dimension Breakdown

Ease of Use

AI

How intuitive is onboarding, UI navigation, and day-to-day usage for the target audience?

Augment Code
3.0
Cline
4.0▲ +1.0

Customization

Calculated

How much can users tailor workflows, settings, prompts, or outputs to their needs?

Augment Code
7.0
Cline
8.0▲ +1.0

Support

AI

How strong is the documentation, customer support, community, and learning resources?

Augment Code
6.0
Cline
10.0▲ +4.0

Integration

Calculated

How well does it connect with other tools, APIs, and workflows?

Augment Code
4.0
Cline
9.0▲ +5.0

Compliance & Data Protection

Calculated

Compliance certifications and data-protection posture, counted from ten verified signals: SOC 2 Type II, GDPR compliance, HIPAA, WCAG AA/AAA, PII redaction, licensed-only training, a published sub-processor list, a downloadable DPA, not training on user data, and a documented deletion path

Augment Code
6.0▲ +4.0
Cline
2.0

Performance

Calculated

Latency + throughput speed

Augment Code
5.0
Cline
5.0

Planning Quality

Calculated

Multi-step planning depth + replanning capability

Augment Code
8.0
Cline
8.0

Calculated = derived from structured signals (integration count, API/open-source config, compliance certs, response-time). AI = LLM-assessed from public website content. Methodology

Task Performance

Augment Code

Task

Cline

7.0
Code Completion
3.0
7.0
Bug Detection
7.0
7.0
Code Explanation
8.0
7.0
Refactoring
9.0
7.0
Test Generation
7.0
6.0
Multi Language Support
8.0
9.0
Context Understanding
9.0
5.0
Documentation Generation
7.0
4.0
Performance Optimization
5.0
7.0
Security Scanning
6.0
8.0
Workflow Building
7.0
7.0
Trigger Variety
5.0

* Task scores (1–10) are algorithmically generated from publicly available data.

Data is sourced from public information and vendor websites. It may not always be up-to-date — verify pricing and features directly with the vendor before purchasing.Report inaccuracy

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the main differences between Augment Code and Cline?
Augment Code — "The agentic SDLC platform for loops". Cline — "AI coding, open source and uncompromised". The Features section on this page compares them side by side.
Who is Augment Code best for compared with Cline?
Augment Code is best for Enterprise engineering teams automating repetitive SDLC tasks at scale; and for Development teams seeking to accelerate code review and merge times. Cline is best for Individual developers seeking an open-source, flexible AI coding assistant; and for Engineering teams refactoring large codebases while maintaining consistency.
How does the pricing of Augment Code compare with Cline?
Augment Code is paid, paid plans start at $20/month. Cline is open source, includes a free plan. Always verify current pricing with the vendor.
Does Augment Code or Cline have a free plan?
Augment Code lists no free plan. Cline is open source. Always verify current pricing with the vendor.
Do Augment Code and Cline offer an API?
Augment Code offers a public API. Cline offers a public API.

Compare More AI Tools

Use our comparison tool to compare up to 5 AI tools side-by-side with AI-powered recommendations.