crewAI vs Agno

Comprehensive side-by-side comparison — features, pricing, performance, and more.

Data last refreshed August 2026

crewAI

CrewAI

The Enterprise Agent Build & Runtime for the work your business runs on

Freemium

84% verification coverage

Agno

Agno Inc.

Agent framework & high-performance runtime for multi-agent systems

Open Source

86% verification coverage

Trust & Reliability

crewAI

Uptime:99.60%Status page

Users:100K-1M

Customers (per vendor):DocuSign, Experian, PepsiCo +7

SOC 2

Agno

Uptime:100%Status page

Users:10K-100K

Customers (per vendor):Key Data, The Kiln, Thinqpoint +2

Too Close to Call

crewAI (6.7) vs Agno (6.3) — difference of 0.3 points

Scores are AI-estimated from publicly available data — not an independent test or a verified user rating. How we rank →

AI Comparison Summary

crewAI

6.7

avg score

Agno

6.3

avg score

Both tools score very similarly overall — the best choice depends on your specific priorities.

Based on 6 dimensions

Scores are AI-estimated from publicly available data — not an independent test or a verified user rating. How we rank →

Too close to call — it's a tie

crewAI

Best For

Enterprise platform teams needing central governance for AI agents

Business teams automating long-horizon work with collaborative AI

Engineers building complex operational agents with robust control

Organizations scaling agentic AI across the organization

Agno

Best For

Engineering teams building custom AI agent platforms for internal use

Developers needing a flexible, high-performance runtime for multi-agent systems

Companies requiring full data privacy and control over their AI infrastructure

Companies running their agent platform in their own cloud

* Verdict is based on our algorithmic scoring of publicly available data. Learn about our methodology

crewAI is best for

💻Coding & Dev8.0🤖Automation & Agents6.0🎧Customer Support5.0

Agno is best for

🤖Automation & Agents8.2💻Coding & Dev8.0📊Data & Analytics8.0

Filter by your use case:

Limitations

crewAI

Cons

Free plan limited to 50 workflow executions per month
Enterprise features like SSO and dedicated support are only available on custom plans
Onboarding and advanced training are available à la carte for enterprise clients

Agno

Cons

Agents, teams and workflows are written in Python
SAML SSO is a paid add-on ($300/mo) rather than an included feature

Weighted Score — Adjust What Matters to You

Pick a profile or drag sliders — scores and radar update instantly on the right.

Quick profiles:

Ease of Use5

Customization5

Support5

Integration5

Compliance & Data Protection5

Performance5

Planning Quality5

Dimension Comparison

crewAI

6.7

/ 10

Your pick

Agno

6.3

/ 10

Dimension Breakdown

Ease of Use

How intuitive is onboarding, UI navigation, and day-to-day usage for the target audience?

crewAI

4.0▲ +3.0

Agno

1.0

Customization

Calculated

How much can users tailor workflows, settings, prompts, or outputs to their needs?

crewAI

9.0

Agno

9.0

Support

How strong is the documentation, customer support, community, and learning resources?

crewAI

9.0

Agno

10.0▲ +1.0

Integration

Calculated

How well does it connect with other tools, APIs, and workflows?

crewAI

5.0

Agno

8.0▲ +3.0

Compliance & Data Protection

Calculated

Compliance certifications and data-protection posture, counted from ten verified signals: SOC 2 Type II, GDPR compliance, HIPAA, WCAG AA/AAA, PII redaction, licensed-only training, a published sub-processor list, a downloadable DPA, not training on user data, and a documented deletion path

crewAI

5.0▲ +3.0

Agno

2.0

Performance

Calculated

Latency + throughput speed

crewAI

8.0

Agno

8.0

Planning Quality

Calculated

Multi-step planning depth + replanning capability

crewAI

—

Agno

—

Calculated = derived from structured signals (integration count, API/open-source config, compliance certs, response-time). AI = LLM-assessed from public website content. Methodology

Task Performance

crewAI

Task

Agno

9.0

Role Definition

8.0

3.0

Task Decomposition

8.0

9.0

Agent Coordination

9.0

3.0

Inter Agent Communication

8.0

Workflow Orchestration

9.0

3.0

Tool Use Delegation

8.0

3.0

State Management

9.0

3.0

Error Recovery

9.0

Observability

9.0

8.0

Scalability Throughput

9.0

Workflow Building

7.0

5.0

Trigger Variety

6.0

* Task scores (1–10) are algorithmically generated from publicly available data.

Data is sourced from public information and vendor websites. It may not always be up-to-date — verify pricing and features directly with the vendor before purchasing.Report inaccuracy

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the main differences between crewAI and Agno?

crewAI — "The Enterprise Agent Build & Runtime for the work your business runs on". Agno — "Agent framework & high-performance runtime for multi-agent systems". The Features section on this page compares them side by side.

Who is crewAI best for compared with Agno?

crewAI is best for Enterprise platform teams needing central governance for AI agents; and for Business teams automating long-horizon work with collaborative AI. Agno is best for Engineering teams building custom AI agent platforms for internal use; and for Developers needing a flexible, high-performance runtime for multi-agent systems.

How does the pricing of crewAI compare with Agno?

crewAI is freemium, includes a free plan. Agno is open source, includes a free plan, paid plans start at $150/month. Always verify current pricing with the vendor.

Does crewAI or Agno have a free plan?

crewAI has a free plan. Agno is open source. Always verify current pricing with the vendor.

Do crewAI and Agno offer an API?

crewAI offers a public API. Agno offers a public API.

Explore Alternatives

crewAI Alternatives

Tools similar to crewAI

Agno Alternatives

Tools similar to Agno

Compare More AI Tools

Use our comparison tool to compare up to 5 AI tools side-by-side with AI-powered recommendations.