Haystack vs Agno

Comprehensive side-by-side comparison — features, pricing, performance, and more.

Data last refreshed August 2026
Haystack logo

Haystack

deepset GmbH

Build custom AI agents and RAG applications with open AI orchestration

Open Source
77% verification coverage
VS
Agno logo

Agno

Agno Inc.

Agent framework & high-performance runtime for multi-agent systems

Open Source
86% verification coverage

Trust & Reliability

Haystack

Uptime:100% (90-day)Status page
Customers (per vendor):Lufthansa Industry Solutions, Accenture, NVIDIA +5
GDPR
SOC 2
HIPAA

Agno

Uptime:100%Status page
Users:10K-100K
Customers (per vendor):Key Data, The Kiln, Thinqpoint +2

Too Close to Call

Haystack (6.5) vs Agno (6.3) — difference of 0.2 points

Scores are AI-estimated from publicly available data — not an independent test or a verified user rating. How we rank →

AI Comparison Summary

Haystack

6.5

avg score

Agno

6.3

avg score

Both tools score very similarly overall — the best choice depends on your specific priorities.

Based on 6 dimensions

Scores are AI-estimated from publicly available data — not an independent test or a verified user rating. How we rank →

Too close to call — it's a tie

Haystack

Best For
AI engineers building production-ready LLM applications
Developers needing explicit control over AI agent decisions
Teams integrating diverse AI models and data stores
Enterprises deploying AI workflows with reliability and observability

Agno

Best For
Engineering teams building custom AI agent platforms for internal use
Developers needing a flexible, high-performance runtime for multi-agent systems
Companies requiring full data privacy and control over their AI infrastructure
Companies running their agent platform in their own cloud

* Verdict is based on our algorithmic scoring of publicly available data. Learn about our methodology

Haystack is best for

🔍Research5.3🎧Customer Support4.5🤖Automation & Agents4.3

Agno is best for

🤖Automation & Agents8.2💻Coding & Dev8.0📊Data & Analytics8.0

Filter by your use case:

Limitations

HaystackHaystack

Cons

  • Enterprise features and support are part of a separate paid offering
AgnoAgno

Cons

  • Agents, teams and workflows are written in Python
  • SAML SSO is a paid add-on ($300/mo) rather than an included feature
Weighted Score — Adjust What Matters to You

Pick a profile or drag sliders — scores and radar update instantly on the right.

Quick profiles:

Ease of Use5
Customization5
Support5
Integration5
Compliance & Data Protection5
Performance5
Planning Quality5

Dimension Comparison

Ease of UseCustomizationSupportIntegrationCompliancePerformancePlanning

Haystack

6.5

/ 10

Your pick

Agno

6.3

/ 10

Dimension Breakdown

Ease of Use

AI

How intuitive is onboarding, UI navigation, and day-to-day usage for the target audience?

Haystack
3.0▲ +2.0
Agno
1.0

Customization

Calculated

How much can users tailor workflows, settings, prompts, or outputs to their needs?

Haystack
9.0
Agno
9.0

Support

AI

How strong is the documentation, customer support, community, and learning resources?

Haystack
10.0
Agno
10.0

Integration

Calculated

How well does it connect with other tools, APIs, and workflows?

Haystack
8.0
Agno
8.0

Compliance & Data Protection

Calculated

Compliance certifications and data-protection posture, counted from ten verified signals: SOC 2 Type II, GDPR compliance, HIPAA, WCAG AA/AAA, PII redaction, licensed-only training, a published sub-processor list, a downloadable DPA, not training on user data, and a documented deletion path

Haystack
4.0▲ +2.0
Agno
2.0

Performance

Calculated

Latency + throughput speed

Haystack
5.0
Agno
8.0▲ +3.0

Planning Quality

Calculated

Multi-step planning depth + replanning capability

Haystack
—
Agno
—

Calculated = derived from structured signals (integration count, API/open-source config, compliance certs, response-time). AI = LLM-assessed from public website content. Methodology

Task Performance

Haystack

Task

Agno

3.0
Role Definition
8.0
3.0
Task Decomposition
8.0
7.0
Agent Coordination
9.0
3.0
Inter Agent Communication
8.0
7.0
Workflow Orchestration
9.0
7.0
Tool Use Delegation
8.0
3.0
State Management
9.0
5.0
Error Recovery
9.0
9.0
Observability
9.0
7.0
Scalability Throughput
9.0
3.0
Task Delegation
8.0
3.0
Parallel Execution
8.0

* Task scores (1–10) are algorithmically generated from publicly available data.

Data is sourced from public information and vendor websites. It may not always be up-to-date — verify pricing and features directly with the vendor before purchasing.Report inaccuracy

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the main differences between Haystack and Agno?
Haystack — "Build custom AI agents and RAG applications with open AI orchestration". Agno — "Agent framework & high-performance runtime for multi-agent systems". The Features section on this page compares them side by side.
Who is Haystack best for compared with Agno?
Haystack is best for AI engineers building production-ready LLM applications; and for Developers needing explicit control over AI agent decisions. Agno is best for Engineering teams building custom AI agent platforms for internal use; and for Developers needing a flexible, high-performance runtime for multi-agent systems.
How does the pricing of Haystack compare with Agno?
Haystack is open source, includes a free plan. Agno is open source, includes a free plan, paid plans start at $150/month. Always verify current pricing with the vendor.
Does Haystack or Agno have a free plan?
Haystack is open source. Agno is open source. Always verify current pricing with the vendor.
Do Haystack and Agno offer an API?
Haystack offers a public API. Agno offers a public API.

Compare More AI Tools

Use our comparison tool to compare up to 5 AI tools side-by-side with AI-powered recommendations.