Exa vs Glean

Comprehensive side-by-side comparison — features, pricing, performance, and more.

Data last refreshed October 2026

Exa

EXA LABS INC.

Web search, built for AI agents

Freemium

78% verification coverage

Glean

Glean Technologies, Inc.

Work AI that Works — Agents, Assistant & Search

Enterprise

82% verification coverage

Trust & Reliability

Exa

Uptime:99.97%Status page

Users:100K-1M

Customers (per vendor):Cognition, Cursor, StackAI +7

GDPR

SOC 2

HIPAA

Glean

Customers (per vendor):Booking.com, Zillow, TIME +7

GDPR

SOC 2

HIPAA

Overall Winner: Exa

7.8/10 vs Glean at 6.7/10

Leads in:

Performance

Support

Ease of Use

Scores are AI-estimated from publicly available data — not an independent test or a verified user rating. How we rank →

AI Comparison Summary

Exa

7.8

avg score

Glean

6.7

avg score

Exa leads overall — particularly in Ease of Use and Support and 1 more.

Glean has an edge in Compliance & Data Protection.

Based on 6 dimensions

Scores are AI-estimated from publicly available data — not an independent test or a verified user rating. How we rank →

Overall Winner

Exa

7.8 / 10

Exa

Best For

AI agents requiring real-time web data

Developers building AI applications needing web search

Mid-market product teams enriching CRM records

Enterprise teams needing custom data indexing and compliance

Glean

Best For

Mid-market and enterprise companies seeking unified knowledge access

Engineering teams improving delivery speed and incident response

Customer service teams resolving tickets faster with AI

Sales teams analyzing data and personalizing outreach

* Verdict is based on our algorithmic scoring of publicly available data. Learn about our methodology

Exa is best for

🔍Research7.5💬Chat & Conversation5.0💻Coding & Dev4.0

Glean is best for

💬Chat & Conversation8.5🔍Research7.5🤖Automation & Agents6.3

Filter by your use case:

Limitations

Exa

Cons

Pricing for enterprise features like SSO, SCIM, and custom SLAs requires contacting sales
Zero data retention is available on Enterprise plans only
HIPAA compliance mode is available on Enterprise plans only for eligible cached retrieval requests

Glean

Cons

No cons listed yet.

Weighted Score — Adjust What Matters to You

Pick a profile or drag sliders — scores and radar update instantly on the right.

Quick profiles:

Ease of Use5

Customization5

Support5

Integration5

Compliance & Data Protection5

Performance5

Planning Quality5

Dimension Comparison

Exa

7.8

/ 10

Clear winner

Glean

6.7

/ 10

Dimension Breakdown

Ease of Use

How intuitive is onboarding, UI navigation, and day-to-day usage for the target audience?

Exa

6.0▲ +5.0

Glean

1.0

Customization

Calculated

How much can users tailor workflows, settings, prompts, or outputs to their needs?

Exa

7.0

Glean

8.0▲ +1.0

Support

How strong is the documentation, customer support, community, and learning resources?

Exa

9.0▲ +4.0

Glean

5.0

Integration

Calculated

How well does it connect with other tools, APIs, and workflows?

Exa

10.0

Glean

10.0

Compliance & Data Protection

Calculated

Compliance certifications and data-protection posture, counted from ten verified signals: SOC 2 Type II, GDPR compliance, HIPAA, WCAG AA/AAA, PII redaction, licensed-only training, a published sub-processor list, a downloadable DPA, not training on user data, and a documented deletion path

Exa

5.0

Glean

8.0▲ +3.0

Performance

Calculated

Latency + throughput speed

Exa

10.0▲ +2.0

Glean

8.0

Planning Quality

Calculated

Multi-step planning depth + replanning capability

Exa

—

Glean

—

Calculated = derived from structured signals (integration count, API/open-source config, compliance certs, response-time). AI = LLM-assessed from public website content. Methodology

Task Performance

Exa

Task

Glean

9.0

Search Accuracy

9.0

7.0

Answer Extraction

9.0

Source Attribution

8.0

9.0

Real Time Indexing

7.0

9.0

Semantic Understanding

9.0

3.0

Multi Modal Search

4.0

8.0

Filter Refinement

7.0

2.0

Personalization

8.0

1.0

Content Detection

2.0

5.0

Knowledge Graph

9.0

3.0

Agent Coordination

7.0

3.0

Task Delegation

7.0

* Task scores (1–10) are algorithmically generated from publicly available data.

Data is sourced from public information and vendor websites. It may not always be up-to-date — verify pricing and features directly with the vendor before purchasing.Report inaccuracy

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the main differences between Exa and Glean?

Exa — "Web search, built for AI agents". Glean — "Work AI that Works — Agents, Assistant & Search". The Features section on this page compares them side by side.

Who is Exa best for compared with Glean?

Exa is best for AI agents requiring real-time web data; and for Developers building AI applications needing web search. Glean is best for Mid-market and enterprise companies seeking unified knowledge access; and for Engineering teams improving delivery speed and incident response.

How does the pricing of Exa compare with Glean?

Exa is freemium, includes a free plan. Glean is enterprise-priced (custom quote). Always verify current pricing with the vendor.

Does Exa or Glean have a free plan?

Exa has a free plan. Glean does not list a free plan in our data. Always verify current pricing with the vendor.

Do Exa and Glean offer an API?

Exa offers a public API. Glean offers a public API.

Explore Alternatives

Exa Alternatives

Tools similar to Exa

Glean Alternatives

Tools similar to Glean

Compare More AI Tools

Use our comparison tool to compare up to 5 AI tools side-by-side with AI-powered recommendations.