SWE-agent vs Devin

Comprehensive side-by-side comparison — features, pricing, performance, and more.

Data last refreshed August 2026
SWE-agent logo

SWE-agent

Princeton University

Open-source autonomous agent for GitHub issues & coding challenges

Open Source
75% verification coverage
VS
Devin logo

Devin

Cognition Labs

The AI software engineer

Paid
76% verification coverage

Trust & Reliability

SWE-agent

Users:10K-100K

Devin

Uptime:99.80%Status page
Customers (per vendor):GE Aerospace, Mercedes-Benz, Nubank +7
GDPR
SOC 2

Overall Winner: Devin

6.3/10 vs SWE-agent at 5.0/10

Leads in:
Planning Quality
Integration
Ease of Use

Scores are AI-estimated from publicly available data — not an independent test or a verified user rating. How we rank →

AI Comparison Summary

SWE-agent

5.0

avg score

Devin

6.3

avg score

Devin leads overall — particularly in Integration and Planning Quality.

Based on 7 dimensions

Scores are AI-estimated from publicly available data — not an independent test or a verified user rating. How we rank →

Overall Winner

Devin

6.3 / 10

SWE-agent

Best For
Researchers building and evaluating autonomous coding agents
Developers automating GitHub issue resolution
Cybersecurity professionals identifying vulnerabilities with AI
Teams solving competitive coding challenges with AI

Devin

Best For
Engineering teams managing complex, multi-repo projects
Developers automating code migrations and refactors
Software development teams needing autonomous bug fixing and issue triage
Enterprises seeking to accelerate modernization of legacy systems

* Verdict is based on our algorithmic scoring of publicly available data. Learn about our methodology

SWE-agent is best for

✍️Writing & Content8.0💬Chat & Conversation8.0🎧Customer Support7.0

Devin is best for

🔍Research9.0✍️Writing & Content8.0💬Chat & Conversation8.0

Filter by your use case:

Limitations

SWE-agentSWE-agent

Cons

  • SWE-agent is now in maintenance-only mode, with development focused on mini-swe-agent
  • Requires a language model of choice (e.g., GPT-4o or Claude Sonnet 4) to function
DevinDevin

Cons

No cons listed yet.

Weighted Score — Adjust What Matters to You

Pick a profile or drag sliders — scores and radar update instantly on the right.

Quick profiles:

Ease of Use5
Customization5
Support5
Integration5
Compliance & Data Protection5
Performance5
Planning Quality5

Dimension Comparison

Ease of UseCustomizationSupportIntegrationCompliancePerformancePlanning

SWE-agent

5.0

/ 10

Devin

6.3

/ 10

Clear winner

Dimension Breakdown

Ease of Use

AI

How intuitive is onboarding, UI navigation, and day-to-day usage for the target audience?

SWE-agent
2.0
Devin
3.0▲ +1.0

Customization

Calculated

How much can users tailor workflows, settings, prompts, or outputs to their needs?

SWE-agent
7.0
Devin
7.0

Support

AI

How strong is the documentation, customer support, community, and learning resources?

SWE-agent
8.0▲ +1.0
Devin
7.0

Integration

Calculated

How well does it connect with other tools, APIs, and workflows?

SWE-agent
2.0
Devin
8.0▲ +6.0

Compliance & Data Protection

Calculated

Compliance certifications and data-protection posture, counted from ten verified signals: SOC 2 Type II, GDPR compliance, HIPAA, WCAG AA/AAA, PII redaction, licensed-only training, a published sub-processor list, a downloadable DPA, not training on user data, and a documented deletion path

SWE-agent
5.0
Devin
5.0

Performance

Calculated

Latency + throughput speed

SWE-agent
5.0
Devin
5.0

Planning Quality

Calculated

Multi-step planning depth + replanning capability

SWE-agent
6.0
Devin
9.0▲ +3.0

Calculated = derived from structured signals (integration count, API/open-source config, compliance certs, response-time). AI = LLM-assessed from public website content. Methodology

Task Performance

SWE-agent

Task

Devin

2.0
Code Completion
6.0
8.0
Bug Detection
8.0
4.0
Code Explanation
7.0
5.0
Refactoring
9.0
6.0
Test Generation
8.0
6.0
Multi Language Support
8.0
8.0
Context Understanding
8.0
3.0
Documentation Generation
8.0
4.0
Performance Optimization
5.0
6.0
Security Scanning
9.0
2.0
Api Management
5.0
3.0
Ci Cd Integration
8.0

* Task scores (1–10) are algorithmically generated from publicly available data.

Data is sourced from public information and vendor websites. It may not always be up-to-date — verify pricing and features directly with the vendor before purchasing.Report inaccuracy

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the main differences between SWE-agent and Devin?
SWE-agent — "Open-source autonomous agent for GitHub issues & coding challenges". Devin — "The AI software engineer". The Features section on this page compares them side by side.
Who is SWE-agent best for compared with Devin?
SWE-agent is best for Researchers building and evaluating autonomous coding agents; and for Developers automating GitHub issue resolution. Devin is best for Engineering teams managing complex, multi-repo projects; and for Developers automating code migrations and refactors.
How does the pricing of SWE-agent compare with Devin?
SWE-agent is open source, includes a free plan. Devin is paid, includes a free plan, paid plans start at $20/month. Always verify current pricing with the vendor.
Does SWE-agent or Devin have a free plan?
SWE-agent is open source. Devin has a free plan. Always verify current pricing with the vendor.
Do SWE-agent and Devin offer an API?
SWE-agent offers a public API. Devin offers a public API.

Compare More AI Tools

Use our comparison tool to compare up to 5 AI tools side-by-side with AI-powered recommendations.